Category Archives: Israel

Values a key factor in winning the war on terror

Andrew Sullivan links to a piece from a Lebanese Christian who grew up hearing anti Israel propaganda, but after being treated in an Israeli hospital, realized the difference between Muslim and Jew. This is a must read.


Proportional Response

I had a conversation with Phil Wilson a couple nights ago in regards to the Israel/Hezbollah situation and the merits of proportional response. Whenever I hear that phrase, it reminds me of Jed Bartlett and the West Wing and this scene

FITZWALLACE All three scenarios are comprehensive, meet the obligations of proportional response and pose minimal threat to U.S. personal and assets. To turn our attention to scenario one, or Pericles One, to use its code name…

What is the virtue of a proportional response?

I’m sorry.

What’s the virtue of a proportional response? Why’s it good? [beat] They hit an
airplane, so we hit a transmitter, right? That’s a proportional response.

Sir, in the case of Pericles…

They hit a barracks, so we hit two transmitters?

That’s roughly it, sir.

It’s what we do. I mean this is what we do.

Yes sir, it’s what we do, it’s what we’ve always done.

Well, if it’s what we do, if it’s what we’ve always done, don’t they know we’re
going to do it?

Sir, if you would turn your attention to Pericles One.

I have turned my attention to Pericles One, it’s two ammo dumps, an abandoned
railroad bridge and a Syrian intelligence agency.

Those are four high rated military targets, sir.

But they know we’re going to do that, they know we’re going to do that. Those areas
have been abandoned for four days. We know that from the satellites. We have the


They did that, so we did this, it’s the cost of doing business, it’s been factored
in, right?

Mr. President…

Am I right or am I missing something here?

No sir, you’re right sir.

Then I ask again, what is the virtue of a proportional response?

It isn’t virtuous Mr. President. It’s all there is sir.

It is not all there is.

Sir, Admiral Fitzwallace…

Excuse me Leo, but pardon me Mr. President, just what else is there?

A disproportional response. Let the word ring forth from this time and this place, you kill an American, any American, we don’t come back with a proportional response, we come back [bangs fist on table] with total disaster!

Are you suggesting we carpet-bomb Damascus?

General, I am suggesting that you and Admiral Fitzwallace and Secretary Hutchinson
and the rest of the national security team take the next sixty minutes and put
together a U.S. response scenario that doesn’t make me think we are just docking
somebody’s damn allowance! [gets up and leaves the room. Everyone stands.]


Today, I came across a discussion of this at Allison Kaplan Sommer’s blog. One of the commenters refered to a section of literature written by Bonhoeffer on this same situation and said:

Let us not forget what Dietrich Bonhoeffer said:

It is better to do evil than be evil.

Bonhoeffer sees judgments of character and not action as fundamental to moral evaluation. Evil actions should be avoided, of course, but what needs to be avoided at all costs is the disposition to do evil as part of our character. “What is worse than doing evil,” Bonhoeffer notes, “is being evil” (Ethics, p.67). To lie is wrong, but what is worse than the lie is the liar, for the liar contaminates everything he says, because everything he says is meant to further a cause that is false. The liar as liar has endorsed a world of falsehood and deception, and to focus only on the truth or falsity of his particular statements is to miss the danger of being caught up in his twisted world. This is why, as Bonhoeffer says, that “(i)t is worse for a liar to tell the truth than for a lover of truth to lie” (Ethics, p.67). A falling away from righteousness is far worse that a failure of righteousness. To focus exclusively on the lie and not on the liar is a failure to confront evil.

I’d never heard that before, but it makes a lot of sense, and explains almost precisely how I feel about the matter.

Another commenter added this quote from Martin Luther King Jr.

“If your opponent has a conscience, then follow Gandhi and non-violence. But if your enemy has no conscience like Hitler, then follow Bonhoeffer.”

It is irrational to let someone with no conscience take over the world. I think it would be un Christ like to sit idly while people suffer. Because we live in a fallen world, I think its essential that we don’t sit by while people suffer. We may still repent for having to harm another human, but sometimes, I just don’t believe there is any other options

Howard Dean

Is it just me or is Howard Dean certifiably crazy? I mean, regardless of what he says, I’m likely not going to vote for a Democrat (thinking about not voting period this year) but its like every time he opens his mouth he’s a liability for his party. For someone as smart as he allegedly is, you’d think he could keep the gaffes to a minimum.

On the Geopolitical front, it appears as if the Israelis are going into Lebanon instead of just lobbing bombs at them. That’s a good thing, because the bombs are doing little against hezbollah. It really is going to take a ground invasion to root this thing out. Its too bad that Lebanon didn’t have a strong enough military to do this themselves though, cause its gonna be bad PR for the Israelis. I pray for peace, but not for faux peace created by politicians, but realy lasting peace that God can bring.

Israel and the Middle East

I am a pessimistic person.

I know you probably hadn’t gathered that from any of my blog posts, but I tend to see the bad before I see the good. Its my personality, something I’d like to change, and have made attempts at, but in the end, I still see the worst. Or maybe the most dramatic. I don’t know.

But whether its the drama or the negative of the situation in the Middle East right now, all I can think about is that this is not going to end well.

I just can’t see peace being brokered between one group that would like peace but has seen firsthand the problems with a nation trying to conceed to a enemy that is hell bent on destroying them. This isn’t a conflict that can be resolved by concession. When one party’s desire is to completely annihilate the other party… there’s not much room for negotiation.

Can you imagine the Prime Minister of Israel asking the Prime Minister of Hamas (Or the head of Hezbollah) if they would stop blowing up people on buses if half of Israel were pushed into the Mediterranean?

We just need to pray that the hearts and minds of those that seek the destruction of Israel are changed… by what means, I don’t know. I do know that this will never end until the Arab World comes to the conclusion that the Israelis are human beings.